Day/Time/Room
June 18, 2026 | 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. | HUB 250
Title: ‘Infrastructuring’ inclusive open access: the case of DOAJ journal indexing criteria
Presenter: Ivonne Lujano, Commuity Manager, She/her, Directory of Open Access Journals
Description: As a global infrastructure for knowledge dissemination based on good publishing practices, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) must navigate a difficult tension: maintaining rigorous global standards without reinforcing colonial power imbalances. This presentation interrogates the politics of classification (Bowker & Star, 2000) within open knowledge infrastructures, focusing on how standardized criteria can inadvertently create barriers for journals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), leading to epistemic injustice (Fricker, 2007). I’ll present the DOAJ indexing criteria as a case of the complex process of ‘infrastructuring’ inclusive open access. DOAJ is not a static technical platform but a living infrastructure co-constructed and maintained by a diverse global community. As such, DOAJ is in a constant state of change: journals are added immediately upon acceptance and removed regularly when they no longer meet the required standards. Beyond formal review, DOAJ also listens to its user community, responding to concerns by investigating journals or publishers flagged through public discourse or internal monitoring. In this way, DOAJ functions not only as an index but as a responsive system shaped by the practices and trust of its global community. The history of DOAJ criteria demonstrates that defining and promoting best practices in OA is not a one-time design challenge, but a continuous, reflexive process.
Title: We Are the Stories we Tell Ourselves: Articulating Impact and Value When Downloads Mean Nothing
Presenter: Dylan Mohr (he/him), Open Scholarship Librarian, Syracuse University
Description: Traditional metrics are meaningless in the age of AI. This is the hardest story to tell both researchers and administrations without devaluing the work of the IR and open scholarship in general. The temptation is to play whack-a-mole with scraper traffic, implementing technical barriers to distinguish “legitimate” from “illegitimate” access. But this approach both fails technically and misses the deeper problem: download metrics were never adequate measures of repository value, and AI scraping simply makes that inadequacy impossible to ignore. We should stop telling that story.
This presentation argues that we need an entirely new set of stories to tell about what repositories (and by extension OA) do. Rather than trying to galvanize compromised metrics, I will propose frameworks for thought around how to talk about IR value that don’t depend on circulation, downloads, and outmoded ideas of engagement. In what is meant to be a participatory discussion, I ask: What stories can we tell about our value and the value of our material if we throw metrics to the wind? How can we reposition the work of digital publishing and also reposition the IR as a pedagogical tool to leverage in AI literacy discussions on campus?
Drawing on experiences at Syracuse University, this presentation provides space for collective brainstorming as well as concrete strategies for shifting administrative and faculty conversations away from the download metric entirely—not by fixing it, but by telling better stories about what repositories actually do for institutions and scholarly communities.
Title: Analyzing Disparities and Trends in Article Processing Charges Publishing: A Case Study of the University of Houston
Presenter: Xiao Zeng (she/her) Open Publishing Librarian, University of Houston
Description: Open access (OA) publishing is growing rapidly. Article processing charges (APCs) now significantly impact scholarly equity and institutional budgets. The University of Houston (UH) is a research-intensive public university with diverse disciplines. As UH is expanding its research output and engaging more in open access publishing, analyzing APC expenditures helps the UH Libraries enhance the current open publishing services and institutional agreements with publishers. This study combines OpenAlex metadata with records from UH’s Open Access and APC support program. This study analyzes publishing behavior from 2021 to 2025.
This study classifies publications using OpenAlex primary fields as top-level concepts. An author fractional contribution method assesses cost burdens across collaborative outputs more accurately. The analysis examines temporal and disciplinary APC patterns: annual expenditure, median and average costs, and publication volumes. Building on this foundation, the study investigates three critical dimensions: 1) Comparisons between UH’s APC publishing trends and broader North American institutional patterns; 2) Disciplinary variations in APCs and their evolution over the five-year period; 3) The extent of APC concentration at the publisher and journal levels.
The findings will provide UH Libraries with evidence-based insights for developing OA support programs that are tailored to the needs of different disciplines. This approach aims to mitigate inequitable cost burdens, evaluate APC agreements and encourage sustainable access to scholarly publishing at the University of Houston.