Past Forum Info

March 27, 2019

Panel: Understanding Usage

Thursday, May 9, 4:00-5:00pm
Room: Joseph & Rosalie Segal Centre (1400-1430)

Unpacking the Impact and Usage of Electronic Theses and Dissertations: A Case Study

Kathryn Ruddock, University of Calgary; Christie Hurrell, University of Calgary

Description: A graduate thesis or dissertation, for most graduate students, represents the culmination of years of research and study, and are an important record of the intellectual output of an academic institution. Like many academic institutions, the University of Calgary began in 2012 to deposit electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) into PRISM, the University of Calgary’s Digital Repository. PRISM provides a valuable archive and dissemination vehicle for unique research outputs of early career researchers. All theses are described and categorized with disciplinary information. Usage data is tracked from November 2015 – present.

These characteristics of the ETD collection also allow for investigation into understanding the usage of these documents and how they relate to other research outputs, like articles and monographs, the impact of which are commonly measured by metrics such as citation counts or download statistics.

For this case study, we investigated the usage patterns of the ETD collection to understand how these scholarly outputs fit into the scholarly communications ecosystem. Through analysis of statistics and metrics available through the repository as well as those available through academic databases, we explore the following questions: What do repository usage statistics tell us about ETDs as a scholarly output? Do factors like subject and length of time available influence higher usage of ETDs in a repository? And does repository usage correlate to a citation advantage, either for the thesis itself or for derivative works?

Open, Free, and Easy Altmetrics Through Community-Owned and Operated Infrastructure

Juan Pablo Alperin, Public Knowledge Project and ScholCommLab

Description: Despite growing discussions about the need for community-owned and operated scholarly publishing infrastructure, there continues to be a lack of community alternatives for key publishing services. Chief among these are those that can be used for tracking the audiences of scholarly research, either through citation metrics or through social media metrics (altmetrics). While the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) has been working to open access to the necessary data for calculating citation metrics, the recently launched Crossref Event Data (CED) service already offers a stream of mentions of research from across the web. However, the data from CED needs further processing to calculate, aggregate, and represent the altmetrics information before it can be used by researchers or publishers. To make this data useful, the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) partnered with ImpactStory to create an open, free, and easy altmetrics service based entirely on open source software, open data, and operated by two non-profit, mission-driven organizations. This new service—Paperbuzz—is already widely available to any journal using Open Journal Systems through a plugin, is natively available to the journals on the Open Library of Humanities platform, and can be added to any webpage through a javascript library (PaperbuzzViz). With Paperbuzz, PKP is building on its 20-year experience as an academic project offering open tools and services, but questions remain about who should be leading such efforts and how they should be funded and sustained. This presentation will touch on the ways in which publishers and librarians can use Paperbuzz and OJS, the advantages and disadvantages of this and other existing altmetrics solutions while simultaneously opening up the discussion on the larger questions surrounding community-based infrastructure.

Building a Trusted Framework for Coordinating OA Monograph Usage Data

Kevin Hawkins, University of North Texas

Description: The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation recently funded a study of the landscape of usage data for open-access scholarly monographs and an investigation of the viability of creating a data trust for sharing of usage data among stakeholders in the publishing ecosystem. In spring 2019, the Book Industry Study Group (BISG) will publish a final white paper that takes into account feedback from the community during a consultation period. This presentation will provide a summary of the main findings and proposals of the forthcoming white paper.

March 27, 2019

Panel: Use This Resource

Thursday, May 9, 2:30-3:30pm
Room: RBC Dominion Securities Executive Meeting Room (2200)

Textbook Training Wheels: Developing Book Templates to Support OER Production

Matt Ruen, Grand Valley State University

Description: Producing an open educational resource (OER) often demands more than subject expertise alone. Formatting and designing a book can be as daunting an obstacle as writing the text in the first place, with many book production tools posing a steep learning curve. At Grand Valley State University, most of our library-published OER authors were familiar with software like LaTeX and InDesign, which allowed them to develop OER that look and function like books. But without dedicated support for layout and design work, we are likely missing opportunities for OER creation by other authors.

To address this gap, I am collaborating with one of our OER authors to develop and test a set of templates, beginning with InDesign, to allow authors to focus more of their time and energy on OER creation, rather than on learning the nuances of software or the norms of book production. In this short presentation, I will give an overview of the template pilot and share the resulting templates.

Findable, Impactful, Citable, Usable, Sustainable: A Rubric for Rigorous Digital Publishing

Nicky Agate, Columbia University Libraries; Cheryl Ball, Wayne State University

Description: What makes a digital publication “excellent”? Its intellectual content? Its attention to underrepresented voices? Superior discoverability? Attention to user experience? When a faculty member or student comes to us with a new publishing idea, how do we know when and why to say no (or better, when to say, “yes, but only if…”)? How do we ensure that digital projects are fully integrated into the scholarly publishing ecosystem—and are recognized and rewarded as first-class scholarly contributions? These are some of the questions that the FiCUS team—a group of library publishers, presses, and digital scholars—posed to ourselves at the 2018 Triangle Scholarly Communication Institute. Our goal was to built a checklist of (more) questions that publishers could ask themselves before embarking on a new digital project, thereby lowering the risks of multimodal, expansive, or experimental digital publishing for libraries, presses, and scholars alike—and empowering us and other publishers to create digital projects that are more visible, more usable, universally accessible, and sustainable. Building on the work of the Ethical Framework for Library Publishing, the Socio-Technical Sustainability Roadmap, and the FAIR Data Principles, we collaborated on a criteria checklist for robust, impactful digital scholarly publishing—noting standards, making recommendations, illustrating best practices, and suggesting alternatives for each element. Designed as a living, collaborate document, the draft checklist requires community input and expertise. To that end, we plan to present it for community feedback at the Library Publishing Forum, inviting attendees to work with us to test our assumptions and priorities in order to enhance and enrich it to make it a valuable resource for all.

Dive into SCUBA: A Collaborative Conference in a Box (partial)

Sarah Wipperman, University of Pennsylvania; Laurie Allen, University of Pennsylvania; Kenny Whitebloom, University of Pennsylvania

Description: Many institutions offer scholarly communications services, platforms, and tools (e.g., institutional repositories, publishing platforms), but we commonly differ in our approaches and priorities. Our needs often overlap, but it can be hard to find meaningful ways to collaborate when we have different resources and goals (e.g., number of staff).

SCUBA (Scholarly Communication UnBoxed Activity) is a blueprint for hosting events where communities work through collaborative activities (both practical and dreamy) designed to build a shared understanding of scholarly communications and to help participants think together about their practices. It is meant to broaden the conversation about the role of libraries in scholarly communication and the technologies we use and to dream up as many great ideas as possible for how we might tackle a set of sticky problems.

SCUBA is flexible in that the “divers” can choose the topics they want to address and select activities and resources that will best help them achieve their goals during their event. The SCUBA event can be held at a single institution or even with multiple institutions. As they complete activities, SCUBA divers are asked to share back their results with the larger community so that we might build a shared understanding of the issues our organizations face and find targeted collaboration opportunities.

In this hybrid presentation and workshop, we will briefly introduce you to SCUBA and how you can run an event at your university. We will then choose one or two activities to run as a group, diving into a topic of the attendees’ choice.

March 27, 2019

Full Session: Member and Mission Driven Publishing: Consortial Library Publishing Programs

Thursday, May 9, 2:30-3:30pm
Room: Canfor Policy Room (1600)

Presenters: Christine Fruin, Scholarly Communication and Digital Projects Manager, Atla; Amanda Hurford, Scholarly Communications Director, Private Academic Library Network of Indiana (PALNI); Olivia MacIsaac, Scholarly Communication Associate, Butler University; Justin Gonder, Senior Product Manager, Publishing, California Digital Library

Description: Library publishing programs do not only exist within the confines of an individual institution. Increasingly, organizations or associations who represent and support libraries are engaging in library publishing activities. While these programs share similarities with traditional library publishing programs, there are also unique challenges posed by publishing at scale. Each presenter will describe how they support distributed library publishing programs with limited resources and will also share accomplishments and lessons learned. Attendees will gain knowledge that they can use to collaboratively develop or expand their library publishing activities that reflect their own mission and needs.

March 27, 2019

Panel: Library Publishing Beyond Books and Journals

Thursday, May 9, 2:30-3:30pm
Room: Barrick Gold Lecture Room (1520)

A Repository for the Community: Report on the British Library – Ubiquity Press Hyku Project

Brian Hole, Ubiquity Press; Torsten Reimer, British Library

Description: The open source Hyku repository system is a highly promising open source option for both large and small institutions, including those with library publishing operations. Hyku is designed to be a cloud-based, multi-tenant turnkey solution. Ubiquity Press and the British Library have been working together for the past year with the rest of the Hyku community to bring the platform to an MVP level. As part of this project the British Library has piloted the platform to see whether it could be provided as a hosted service to other memory institutions. At the same time Ubiquity has focused on developing the platform as a no-lock-in product offering that is integrated with its open source journal, book and conference publishing systems. This presentation will describe the work done and evaluate the platform in light of both organization’s goals.

Working Papers, A Work in Progress: Integrating Libraries with Publication and Preprint Services

Anna Oates, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Description: The vitality of open preprint services in the “creation and dissemination of knowledge” is irrefutable (Lynch, 2017). They enhance scholarship by enabling communities to interact with each other at the early stages of the research process. In the case of economics, the distribution of preprints is embedded in the culture of researchers’ scholarly communication. Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), founded by Thomas Krichel, has been a central force in the democratization of economic research culture since it began in 1997. RePEc is a subject bibliography of economic research, which indexes books, papers (i.e., working papers or preprints), articles, and software. It aggregates metadata from 200 contributing “archives” to freely distribute economic research. Among the contributing RePEc archives is Fed in Print, “the central catalog of publications [, working papers, and speeches] of the US Federal Reserve System.” Established in 1960 by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Library, Fed in Print has existed under the aegis of libraries and librarians since its genesis. In 2014, Fed in Print integrated its system model to function as a RePEc archive, automatically feeding all scholarly production to RePEc. As Judy Ruttenberg elucidated in her presentation for ACRL’s webinar on “Preprint Repositories in the Social Sciences,” libraries and librarians are central to the framework of preprint services. As advocates for open practices, research lifecycle experts, and stewards of the scholarly record, librarians are fundamental forces to the ongoing development of sustainable preprint services. This presentation will provide a case study on Fed in Print as a model for unifying workflows for discovery of working papers and publications within library services. In addition, this presentation will discuss an extensible, exploratory framework to support increased standardization of scholarly records and democratization of RePEc maintenance, furthering the utility and efficiency of RePEc as a discovery service.

Lessons Learned From Online Publishing at the Library

Brian Sweeting, Digital Publishing Manager, EdLab, Teachers College, Columbia University; Rob Crawford, Digital Publishing Associate, EdLab, Teachers College, Columbia University; Gary Natriello, Ruth L. Gottesman Professor in Educational Research, Teachers College, Columbia University; Hui Soo Chae, Senior Director, Gottesman Libraries, Teachers College, Columbia University

Description: New Learning Times (www.newlearningtimes.com) is a mobile-friendly open educational resource that provides daily coverage of advances in learning technology, with a focus on innovation, entrepreneurship, accessibility, and diversity.

All of the content is produced and published by a dedicated group of students and staff situated in the library at Teachers College.

In this presentation, we’ll share the lessons we’ve learned from building a publishing team from scratch in a library space. We’ll focus on short and sweet tips for:

Recruiting a small team for in-house content creation
Optimizing for a fast and flexible workflow
Supporting innovation in the workplace
Creating opportunities for professional development
Collecting and sharing data

March 27, 2019

Full Session: Platforms and People: Building a Publishing House in the Library

Thursday, May 9, 2:30-3:30pm
Room: Joseph & Rosalie Segal Centre (1400-1430)

Presenters: Maria Bonn, School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign; marilyn thomas-houston, Associate Professor Emerita, African American Studies and Anthropology, University of Florida, Editor, Fire!!!: The Multimedia Journal of Black Studies; Daniel Tracy, Head, Scholarly Communication and Publishing, University Library, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Janet Swatscheno, Digital Publishing Librarian, University of Illinois Chicago

Description: Publishing Without Walls, a humanities centered digital scholarly publishing initiative based in the university library at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, grows out of the principle that sustainable publishing operations capitalize upon on existing investments in platform development, by choosing those platforms that best meet the needs of scholars and that library infrastructure can best sustain. Rather than investing in building new platforms, it places its emphasis on the human element of publishing, focusing on outreach and support, with a sensitivity to the social and institutional contexts of the scholars it serves, as well as understanding the publishing goals of scholars through a purposeful and self-conscience research effort. This panel will offer perspectives from various sectors of the project: the publications and workflows team will discuss the challenges and opportunities of leveraging existing publishing platforms as building blocks; outreach representatives will talk about the needs of scholars in Afro-American studies and at HBCUs, as well as connecting with scholars at other partner institutions, some close to hand, some scattered across the midwest, and their role in cementing the relationship between the authors and the platforms and the authors and the publisher and, in the end, the scholarship and its audience. We will also share some of the research insights and how those inform the design of the publishing house.

March 27, 2019

Full Session: Students Perception of Open Textbooks: Students Tell Us What They Think About Open Textbooks in Their Courses

Thursday, May 9, 1:15-2:15pm
Room: RBC Dominion Securities Executive Meeting Room (2200)

Presenters: Karen Bjork, Portland State University; Kristi Jensen, University of Minnesota

Description: Textbooks have long been an integral learning platform in higher education. As the rising cost of textbooks continues to burden students, many libraries have begun to facilitate the creation and publishing of open textbooks. While many colleges and universities have surveyed students about their textbook purchasing habits and interest in open textbooks, fewer surveys have captured student feedback on their actual hands on experiences with their resources. Portland State University (PSU) Library and the University of Minnesota (UofM) Libraries have both collected date from students about their experiences with open textbooks selected and created specifically for their courses.

In 2013, PSU Library developed an open textbook publishing program that works with faculty to create open textbooks that are designed specifically for the courses that they teach. To determine the role of open textbooks in higher education and their effectiveness, PSU Library surveyed the students taking courses with open textbook designed by their professors. The survey investigates students’ textbook purchasing behavior; how they access and use their open textbook, including their format preferences; and their perceptions of their open textbook, including its quality and what features they like and dislike.

The UofM University Libraries has worked with faculty through our Partnership for Affordable Content grants since 2015. The results of the grant projects primarily produced digital materials and several projects published open textbooks. Headlines frequently report “research” that concludes student preference for print over digital materials. In order to better understand the student experience in courses utilizing digital affordable content at the UofM, the University Libraries surveyed students to gauge the impact on study skills and to garner positive outcomes and challenges from the student perspective.

This presentation will discuss the results of the surveys, the study’s strengths and limitations, and provide recommendations for future open textbook authors and publishing programs.

March 27, 2019

Full Session: The Art of Courting: Connecting Library Publishers with Extrainstitutional Scholar-Led Projects

Thursday, May 9, 1:15-2:15pm
Room: Joseph & Rosalie Segal Centre (1400-1430)

Marcel LaFlamme, University of Washington; Lauren Collister, University of Pittsburgh; Eileen Joy, punctum books/University of California, Santa Barbara; Jessica Kirschner, Virginia Commonwealth University

Description: All library publishers have a commitment to supporting publication projects based at their institutions. But increasingly, library publishers are also looking outward to external partners as part of a broader shift in academic librarianship from acquiring content for local stakeholders to supporting the production of open scholarship across the globe. Participants in this session playfully use the trope of courtship to explore how library publishers and extrainstitutional scholar-led projects can identify one another, assess their compatibility, and form a union. Inspired by queer theory’s rejection of normative pathways to a proper relationship, though, we emphasize an open-ended process of mutual discovery as librarians and scholars decide together on the institutional arrangements that can best support their shared vision. Questions that we will consider include: What should library publishers look for in an extrainstitutional scholar-led project, and vice versa? What are the material technologies and social contexts by which potential partners can be identified, and how do we ensure that these are maximally accessible? How do library publishers make the case for extrainstitutional partnerships within their institutions, and what are some of the concerns around sustaining such partnerships for the long haul? Finally, how can library publishers work together to manage the issue of scope, avoiding the need for each library to be an expert at all types of publishing?

March 27, 2019

Panel: Shaped by the Field: How Disciplines Influence Publishing

Thursday, May 9, 1:15-2:15pm
Room: Barrick Gold Lecture Room (1520)

The Field-Specific Library Partnership Consortium: A Proposal

Jeff Pooley, Associate Professor of Media & Communication, Muhlenberg College

Description: This presentation outlines a proposal for a consortium of academic libraries in the media, film, and communication fields to support non-profit OA publishing. The presentation, while focused on the media studies case, is intended to suggest an adaptable model for other library partnership consortia in disciplines with field-specific libraries and library budgets. The proposal is predicated on a pair of linked arguments about the future of OA publishing. The first is that the author-pays model is both unsustainable and unjust: While workable at a sliver of elite institutions in the rich West, and across a swath of externally funded disciplines, the system breaks down for the Global South, for non-elite Western institutions, and for the humanistic social sciences and humanities. A second claim, which follows from the first, is that a rich, fair and sustainable OA ecosystem will draw from library budgets. A modest proportion of funds propping up the tolled-access present could support a lower-cost ecosystem of library-hosted, university press, and independent nonprofit publishing built atop an open-source infrastructure. With the Open Library of Humanities’ Library Partnership Subsidy model as inspiration, this presentation proposes a field-specific version of the idea, centered on the media studies fields. The consortium differs from the OLH model as a (1) standalone, independent entity governed by librarians, with a (2) field-specific remit. The consortium will act as a dumbbell-like *funding intermediary*, connecting an array of library funders to an array of publishers and platforms. Specific legal and governance issues—including the role of an academic advisory board, sustainability challenges, and potential conflicts of interest—will be addressed. The proposal will conclude with a discussion of the model’s real but limited portability to other disciplinary context.

RavenSpace: Digital Publishing in Indigenous Studies

Darcy Cullen, UBC Press; Beth Fuget, University of Washington Press

Description: RavenSpace is a new publishing platform for media-rich, networked, interactive books in Indigenous studies that provides a digital space where communities and scholars can work together to share and create knowledge. Based on Scalar and other open-source software, the platform meets the standards of peer-reviewed academic publishing and respects Indigenous protocols for accessing and using cultural heritage and traditional knowledge. The idea behind RavenSpace was developed in part through conversations between library and press staff at UBC, who presented their initial thinking at LPF in 2015. In this presentation, we’ll discuss the progress made since then in the first phase of building the platform and publishing the first projects, including adapting the technical pieces and developing the editorial and review processes. We’ll look at pending issues still to resolve for long-term sustainability. We’ll also explore the roles that library-based publishers or digital scholarship centers might play in our initiative.

The Art of Student Publishing: An Exploration of the Significance and Application of Artist Publishing Practices and Discourse for Undergraduate Publishing Initiatives

Dana Ospina, Digital Initiatives Librarian, California State University Dominguez Hills

Description: There exists a long and varied culture of publishing within the history of artistic production, some of which interrogates the presumptions and practices of publishing itself. As someone with a background in art history, and as a current Digital Initiatives Librarian and liaison to visual and performing arts departments, I have begun to explore and research this field of artistic practice and to consider how one would go about introducing some of these concepts and strategies to undergraduates within the context of a library publishing program.

I am motivated to pursue this line of inquiry because of the active engagement in undergraduate scholarly production already underway in library publishing programs: undergraduate research journals, presentation posters, and artifacts of open pedagogical practices are just some of the publication forms that provide library publishing faculty and staff with an opportunity not only to support students in the procedural aspects of creation (i.e. discoverability, access, and preservation), but also in their information literacy development as thoughtful, informed, critical thinkers. The ability for traditional undergraduate research to be nurtured and developed by existing models of scholarly communication is an incredible asset, but what of undergraduate interest and models of production that fall outside more conventional scholarly communication parameters? Can library publishing provide a successful site for these practices, much in the way many library publishing programs have made space for niche publications and nontraditional forms of faculty scholarship? This short presentation begins to address these questions through a discussion of some of the projects, practices, and theories about publishing developed by artists. It is my contention that an awareness of the work of these artists can provide additional perspectives of the process and practice of publishing, and expand the reach of undergraduate publishing initiatives.

March 27, 2019

Full Session: Fellows Forum

Thursday, May 9, 1:15-2:15pm
Room: Canfor Policy Room (1600)

Presenters: Kate McCready, University of Minnesota Libraries/2018-19 LPC Board President; Reggie Raju, University of Cape Town, 2017-19 LPC Fellow; Charlotte Roh, University of San Francisco, 2017-19 LPC Fellow

Description: Since July of 2017, Library Publishing Coalition Fellows Reggie Raju and Charlotte Roh have been participating in the LPC community, making important service contributions to task forces and bringing critical issues to the community’s attention on the LPC blog at https://librarypublishing.org/category/blog/fellows-journal/. As they move towards the end of their two year-long fellowships, their work will culminate with this hour-long session at the Library Publishing Forum. They will each give a 15-minute presentation on aspects of library publishing that have become priorities for them. Reggie will explore ‘Library publishing as an agent for inclusion’ to provoke broader thinking and commitment among our LPC colleagues. Charlotte will be discussing the work of Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC), founded by 10 trade and professional associations that represent organizations and individuals working in scholarly communications. The Coalition was formed to discuss and address issues of diversity and inclusion within our industry. The latter part of the session will engage all attendees in a discussion of these topics, moderated by LPC Board President Kate McCready.

Would you like a chance to hear from Reggie and Charlotte about their fellowship experiences over the past year? Are you interested in further exploration of the topics they have raised on the blog? Do you want to get our fellows’ perspectives on a topic that’s important to you? Don’t miss what is sure to be a thought-provoking session!

March 27, 2019

Panel: Improving Journal Publishing

Thursday, May 9, 11:15am-12:15pm
Room: Canfor Policy Room (1600)

What We Can Learn from the Online Graveyard of Inactive Undergraduate Student Journals

Robyn Hall, MacEwan University

Description: Undergraduate open access journals provide a valuable opportunity for students to disseminate their work online and begin to establish an academic footprint, while learning about academic peer-review and publishing processes first-hand. At the same time that these publications give direct benefit to students, however, many of these venues have come and gone over the last two decades, raising questions as to what it takes to keep a student journal going consistently long-term, as well as what to do with these publications once they have ceased production. Drawing on findings from an analysis of student journals that have been inactive for at least two years and that are hosted by North American university publishing services, this presentation investigates common reasons why student journals become defunct. In light of these findings, it provides insights into how current university journal hosting service providers and publishers can help ensure the continued existence of student publications moving forward. It also discusses best practices around what to do when a student journal is discontinued in terms of communicating to users that the journal is no longer accepting submissions, and strategies for providing long-term access and digital preservation of these works.

Journal Interface Design: How Does It Impact the User Experience?

Israel Cefrin, Public Knowledge Project

Description: If “every book has a reader”, it is reasonable to say that every journal has a reader/user. Customizing, and assessing, a digital interface is a simple movement towards improving user experience and the content using, reusing and sharing as well. Furthermore, Open Access journals should also consider the following question: how friendly is my content to be reused?

Nowadays there are a variety of platforms to publish scientific content. Likewise, there is a large number of journals available, especially in Open Access mode. A simple search with tools like Google Scholar may list Journals, however, be listed in Google resulting page is the very first part of the user experience process concerning digital products.

According to the customization level, and the journal manager awareness, it is possible to offer a unique experience with a customized user interface. Hence, personal computers, tablets and, even more, mobile devices are able to access the public front-end without restrictions and with a possible better sense of it.

Giving attention to a Journal interface complies with recommendations from Ranganathan’s Laws of Library Science. A well organized, easy to use, recognizable and reliable interface may bring and keep users and foster the reuse of the Journal content as well.

The Weaknesses of Automated Taxonomy, A Case Study

Alexa Colella, Marketing Manager for Journals, University of Illinois Press; Steffanie Cain, Strategic Taxonomy Lead, University of Illinois Press

Description: We recently discovered that the automated technology used by a major content hosting and subscription platform was inappropriately categorizing our journal articles. After some investigation and collaboration with the platform, we were able to identify some solutions to fixing this problem. However, it illuminated a rather major shortfall of automated taxonomy; automated taxonomy systems do not possess the discursive nuance of the academy (or humans in general), nor do they have the ability to learn it.

We discovered that this weakness exists on a spectrum. Though this observation is fairly anecdotal, the technology seemed to perform well in scientific articles (ones with fewer uses of creative, colloquial, or metaphorical use of language) and performed poorly in the humanities.

In this presentation we will present our case study detailing the discovery, methodology, challenges, and solutions in correcting inappropriately placed topics in a major content hosting platform. We will also discuss what this study illuminated for us about the use of automation in scholarly communication on a larger scale: its strengths, weaknesses, and the challenges it poses for us in the future.