Posts by Melanie Schlosser

July 11, 2025

Second round of our platform accessibility investigation

By

About these investigations: LPC has been taking an all-hands-on-deck approach to web accessibility for the last year. The updates to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act – as well as similar regulations in other parts of the world – are aligned with our values as a community, but will take substantial effort to comply with for most library publishers. To support this work, LPC has teamed up with the Library Accessibility Alliance to provide a variety of professional development opportunities. Looking outward, we are also using our position as a community hub to investigate one of the elements of web accessibility that library publishers can’t control individually – publishing platforms. 

Round one: See our February 12 blog post for a description of our methods and the results of our first round of investigations, which included OJS, Pressbooks, and Janeway. After the blog post was published, we hosted a series of community calls – one for each platform – so LPC members could speak directly with platform developers and representatives about accessibility. 

Round two: This post is reporting out on our second round of platform outreach, in which we contacted DSpace, Omeka, Fulcrum, Manifold, and Digital Commons (again). 

The question set: We used the same set of questions as round one: 

Testing

  • What technical or legal conformance standard have you adopted for your product(s)?
  • How do you test for accessibility?
  • Do you test all areas of your platform (e.g. reader interface, author interface, editorial interface, admin interface) and your user-facing documentation (including online product documentation and help/support resources)? 

Development

  • Do you have a development roadmap for increasing accessibility? Can you share it? 
  • Do you have a process for collecting and responding to user reports of accessibility errors? Are those reports treated as bugs or feature requests?
  • Do you have a process for development contributors to submit fixes for accessibility issues? 

Content and customizations

  • How do you support/encourage users in creating accessible content? 
  • How do you support/encourage developers to maintain accessibility in local customizations? 

Documentation

  • Does your company have an internal digital accessibility policy (or equivalent) and public accessibility statement? If so, please provide the URL.
  • Do you have a VPAT or other accessibility information on your website? If so, provide a URL. If not, can you provide your latest Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) or Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR)?

Responses: We received full responses from DSpace, Omeka, and Fulcrum. Manifold asked to respond in the fall once they finish a round of development. Digital Commons continues to not get back to us. 

Results: The responses received from the three platforms were very similar to those provided by PKP, Pressbooks, and Janeway. A summary of previous platform responses can be found in this blog post.  A notable difference between the two groups is related to content and customizations. Currently, only Fulcrum provides resources to help users create accessible content (Omeka and DSpace indicated that they are exploring additional ways to encourage/support accessibility).

  • Accessibility information
  • All three platforms have publicly available accessibility information (DSpace, Omeka, Fulcrum). 
    • Fulcrum provides a public accessibility roadmap; DSpace incorporates accessibility features into the roadmap for major releases.
    • All platforms have publicly available VPATs (Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates): DSpace, Omeka, Fulcrum

We will share the full answers from each platform with the LPC community via email. 

Next steps: We will follow up with Manifold in the fall and will share their responses with the community. 


June 24, 2025

An update on University-Based Publishing Futures work

By

We know it’s been quiet on the UBPF front since our launch webinar last fall, but there’s been a lot happening behind the scenes. Here’s a quick round-up of what we’ve been up to AND a save-the-date for an in-person gathering in 2026! 

Statement signatories: We have added 26 new signatories to the community statement! Those 24 join the original three communities that kicked off this work – the Association of University Presses, the Library Publishing Coalition, and the Association of Research Libraries. If your organization is not yet a signatory, you can still become one by filling out the Organizational Support Form.

Knowledge Sharing Working Group: This group is working on a brief survey to identify existing resources and professional development needs. Keep your eyes open for that this summer!

Advocacy Working Group: This group has completed a landscape scan and is developing a strategic communications campaign to support university-based publishers in communicating the value of publishing in a university setting to critical audiences. 

Ad-hoc signatories working group: There is an option on the Organizational Support Form to indicate that your organization would like to help support the community’s work beyond becoming a signatory. We invited representatives from the organizations that checked that box to a meeting in January where we reviewed the work happening and the gaps that still needed filling. The conversation was so productive that the group decided to keep meeting as a sort of ad-hoc working group. This group will keep an eye on the progress of the working groups, help connect their work to important audiences, and fill in support gaps for the facilitating organizations. (For example, a member of the signatories group stepped up to co-facilitate the Knowledge Sharing Working Group.) This group is also taking the place – for now – of the planned cross-working group leadership meetings, though we do hope to still create an opportunity for the different working groups to meet with each other. 

UBPF Group Hub in Knowledge Commons: At our launch webinar, we invited anyone who was interested in being a part of this community to register on Knowledge Commons and join the UBPF Group Hub. Our hope was that this would enable asynchronous discussion and community formation. However, due to a combination of technical hurdles (people having trouble signing up) and lack of facilitator bandwidth for seeding those conversations, this hasn’t happened. The signatories group is aware of this as a gap in our planned set of activities, and is thinking about alternative communications strategies to keep the community in the loop. 

UBPF gathering, June 2026: The AUPresses 2026 Annual Meeting and the 2026 Library Publishing Forum are both taking place in June in Seattle, WA. We deliberately scheduled them a day apart so that we could co-host a day of joint programming (June 16) that would welcome participants from both conferences (and anyone who just wants to pop in for the day). Plans for that event are still in development, but we are tentatively planning for it to be University-Based Publishing Futures-themed, so please pencil it in! In addition to giving us our first opportunity to gather in person, that event will serve as a check-in point for the community. The working groups are considering it a deadline for their current work packages, so it will be a good moment to think about next steps for this community. 


May 28, 2025

Reporting out on the finances of the 2025 Library Publishing Forum

By

We at LPC are big fans of transparency, so we have decided to report out publicly on the financial details of each year’s Library Publishing Forum. These reports are meant to serve as a resource for fellow conference planners, as well as helping our community better understand the decisions we make around the event. If you missed the report out on last year’s in-person conference, you can read it hereThis post will report out on the finances for the virtual Forum held May 5-8, 2025.

(more…)


February 12, 2025

LPC investigates publishing platform accessibility

By

by Melanie Schlosser and Shannon Kipphut-Smith

LPC is taking an all-hands-on-deck approach to web accessibility this year. The updates to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act – as well as similar regulations in other parts of the world – are aligned with our values as a community, but will take substantial effort to comply with for most library publishers. To support this work, LPC has teamed up with the Library Accessibility Alliance to provide a variety of professional development opportunities, including  webinars and a themed Documentation Month. Looking outward, we are also using our position as a community hub to investigate one of the elements of web accessibility that library publishers can’t control individually – publishing platforms. 

Creating a list of platforms

With the support of LPC’s Board, a small group of staff and volunteers from both communities made a list of the most-used platforms (based on data from the Library Publishing Directory) and identified a subset of particular interest. The criteria for inclusion were: 

  • The software is in a stable, production version and is still being developed and supported. (Example: We excluded PubPub upon hearing from the PubPub team that they are in the process of moving away from their legacy platform and developing a new one.)
  • The software is publishing-specific. (Example: We included Digital Commons, because it has specific publishing functionality, but excluded DSpace as a repository platform that is incidentally used for publishing.)
  • The software is widely used or emerging (Example: Janeway and Scalar had the same number of users in the Directory [13 each], but Janeway is a new platform that is rapidly growing its user base within library publishing.)

The final list of platforms to investigate was: 

There are a number of other platforms used by our community (including some that were developed by community members, like Manifold), and we hope to reach more of them in a second round of the process. This abbreviated list was a jumping off point to allow us to try out this process. 

(more…)


December 18, 2024

How has the field changed in the last 10 years? An excerpt from the 2024 Library Publishing Directory

By

Editor’s note: As much as we love the searchable online interface for the Library Publishing Directory, it doesn’t include the introduction found in the print, PDF, and EPUB versions. Each year, the Directory‘s introduction includes a ‘state of the field’ based on that year’s data that highlights trends and new developments in library publishing as reported by the programs that contribute their information. To make it easier to find, we are republishing that portion of the introduction here.


By the LPC Directory Committee

Key Findings/Overview

In recognition of the Library Publishing Directory’s 10 year anniversary, we took this opportunity to look back at the first Directory from 2014 and to highlight some of the trends and developments we identified in the data from 2014 to 2024.

In this year’s edition of the Directory, we received responses from 179 publishers in 18 countries, and 167 long-form responses are featured in the Directory. The number of respondents has grown gradually since the first Library Publishing Directory in 2014, when 116 library publishers completed the survey. We also see a much higher number in the unique institutions that have participated in the last decade: in the Directory‘s lifetime 383 library programs have responded to the call for entries. Most respondents (92%) represent academic libraries, which is consistent with previous years. Of the remaining respondents, 5% identified their institution type as consortia, 1% as member organizations, and 2% as other.

The survey itself has grown and changed over the years, beginning with just two main sections, Overview and Publishing Activities, in 2014. By 2024 it has grown to include sections on each publishing program’s organization and oversight, partnerships, technologies and services, program highlights, and most recently, policies.

The information we wanted as a community in the first half of the Directory’s life focused on what services to offer, what technologies balance functionality and sustainability, and the quantity of resources, human or otherwise, to dedicate to these efforts. More recently, the community is asking questions about managing existing services, formalizing policies, working in collaboration within and outside of our institutions, and sustaining the people that make all this happen.

In comparing the 2014 and 2024 survey results, we identified a number of positive trends in terms of staffing, technology use, geographic diversity, and publishing program expansion and stability. These positive trends are highlighted here and explained in more detail in the relevant sections below:

  • The Directory has become much more geographically diverse, with publishers from 18 countries contributing in 2024 compared to 5 countries in 2014. 
  • The median age of respondents’ programs has increased 100% from 7 years to 14 years, even as dozens of newly established programs have contributed to the Directory. For example, 53 of the 2024 respondents’ programs did not yet exist when the first Directory was published.
  • In 2014, 61% of respondents were using a proprietary platform for at least one of their publishing initiatives. In 2024, however, less than half (47%) of respondents were using a proprietary platform.
  • Staffing at library publishers has increased 33% from a median of 1.5 FTE in 2014 to 2 FTE in 2024.
  • A typical library publisher added one service between 2014 and 2024, with a median of 10 services offered in 2024 compared to 9 in 2014. The number of possible services identified by the survey increased significantly (29%) over the decade, from 24 to 31.
  • Although services increased in multiple areas, the reported provision of traditional library services such as cataloging and metadata decreased by over 10%.

(more…)


September 20, 2024

Reporting out on the finances of the 2024 Library Publishing Forum

By

This is the third of three planned report-outs on this year’s Library Publishing Forum. The other two were on our COVID policy and on the closing plenary discussion. Check them out! 

Conference finances are tricky – ask anyone who has ever planned a multi-day, in-person event. Costs are sometimes unpredictable and revenues almost always are. The last four years have added additional complexities for many conference planners, including wildly fluctuating attendance and binding hotel contracts for events that were forced to go virtual. Conference finances also tend to be somewhat mysterious to attendees, who can be left wondering what their registration fees actually cover and whether the event is intended to break even or to make money for its organizers.  We at LPC are big fans of transparency, so we have decided to report out publicly on the financial details of the Library Publishing Forum. We did this once before (as part of a series of reflections on the 2021 virtual Forum), but our plan is to make it a regular component of Forum planning going forward. To that end, this post will report out on the finances for the in-person Forum held in May of 2024 in Minneapolis, MN. We hope that this post will serve as a resource for fellow conference planners, as well as helping our community better understand the decisions we make around the event.

(more…)


September 18, 2024

Wrapping up our 10th anniversary celebration with the LPC Yearbook!

By

Our thanks to the LPC community for celebrating our 10th anniversary with us over the last year! We’ve had some great conversations (both nostalgic and forward-looking), we’ve eaten some celebratory cupcakes, we’ve given out a special service award, and we’ve welcomed a batch of new members via our 10th anniversary membership special. Now we are putting the icing on the cake that is this year with the publication of the LPC Yearbook.

The Yearbook is an informal, collaborative publication full of photos and quotes contributed by community members, organized by year. If you’ve ever wondered what LPC’s original website looked like (very Drupal-y), or wanted to see photos of our most iconic conference swag ever (the Pubrarian/Liblisher totes from 2016), or just wanted to take a trip down library publishing memory lane, check it out!

Many thanks to the community members who contributed to the Yearbook, but especially Katherine Skinner and Justin Gonder for the wealth of photography.


Water with the word reflections in all caps with a horizontal line above and below
August 13, 2024

A 10-Year Vision for Library Publishing (LPForum24 Closing Plenary Reflection)

By

The 2024 Library Publishing Forum opened with a keynote address that looked back on LPC’s first 10 years. Katherine Skinner reflected on the formation of the community, its original goals, and what it has accomplished. For long-time community members, the talk was a trip down memory lane. For newer folks, it was a stellar orientation. It also fit beautifully with our 10th anniversary theme for the conference, but it wasn’t just an exercise in nostalgia. Instead, it provided grounding for the real conversation we wanted to have at the event: where we want to be 10 years in the future. 

(more…)


June 24, 2024

Reflecting on the 2024 LPForum COVID policy

By

A back view of Katherine Skinner, keynote speaker, with McNamara Memorial Hall in the background
Katherine Skinner gives the keynote at the 2024 Library Publishing Forum. Image credit: Adria Carpenter/U of M Libraries

 

Multiple groups within LPC spent months developing a COVID policy for this year’s in-person Library Publishing Forum. Now that the event is behind us, I wanted to take a moment to reflect on how the policy was developed, how it worked in practice, and the feedback we received from the community. I hope that this blog post, in conjunction with the policy itself, will serve as a resource for other conference planners.

Policy recap

Our COVID policy was designed around three principles:

  1. As the organizers, we have a responsibility to provide the safest possible conference for our community. In the same way that we provide attendees with chairs to sit on and meals to eat, and speakers with microphones so that everyone can hear them, it is our job to provide attendees with a safe conference environment.
  2. Each attendee has a responsibility of care to the rest of the community. This principle is grounded in our community Code of Conduct, which lays out an expectation that community members will follow health guidelines.
  3. The policy needed to be flexible enough that attendees could determine which precautions were possible for them without having to disclose private medical information to conference staff and other attendees.

Once these principles were clear, the policy itself was fairly straightforward: we would provide masks, tests, supplemental air filtration, and boxed meals that could be taken outside; and attendees would manage their own COVID precautions (encouraged by copious and emphatic messaging before and during the conference). There is more detail in the full policy, including a list of precautions that we encouraged attendees to take, but the overall message was that everyone needs to do their part.

(more…)